About this journal
Advances in Cognitive Psychology (ACP) is an open access, peer-reviewed scientific journal covering all areas and aspects of human cognitive psychology, including, but not limited to, perception, attention, memory, social cognition, and language processing in behavioral, cognitive, psychophysiological, and neuropsychological perspectives, as well as in computer- and modeling-based science. We welcome original empirical and theoretical articles, as well as replications, reports of null findings, and literature reviews. ACP also promotes and encourages open science, pre-registration of study and is a peer community in registered reports (PCI RR) - friendly journal. We are also indexed in a range of major databases, including PubMed, Scopus, JCR, and PsycINFO (eISSN: 1895-1171).
Advances in Cognitive Psychology is co-financed by the Ministry of Education and Science (Ministerstwo Edukacji i Nauki) under the program "Rozwój czasopism naukowych," RCN/SN/0494/2021/1.
Issue 3 Online: 19 August 2024
Editorial: EEG Signal Processing in Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
Emilia Zabielska-Mendyk, Ludmiła Zając-Lamparska
Emilia Zabielska-Mendyk, Department of Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 14 20-950 Lublin, Poland. Email: zabiela@kul.lublin.pl
We are glad to present you with a special issue of Advances in Cognitive Psychology (ACP) and we want to thank you for your interest in how novel EEG signal analysis methods contribute to better understanding of perception and cognitive processes.
Emotional Cues Reduce the Effects of Anticipation Violation on ERP Responses to Facial Expressions
Jiafeng Liang, Huiyan Lin, Hua Jin
Huiyan Lin, Laboratory for Behavioral and Regional Finance, School of National Finance, Guangdong University of Finance, 510521, Guangzhou, China. Email: huiyanlin@gduf.edu.cn.
Hua Jin, Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of the Ministry of Education, Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, 300387, Tianjin, China. Email: jinhua@tjnu.edu.cn
Individuals frequently expect consequences—in particular emotional consequences—based on nonemotional or emotional information conveyed by environmental cues. However, in an everchanging world, (emotional) consequences are sometimes incongruent with expectations. Past event-related potential (ERP) studies have revealed effects of anticipation violation on facial expression processing when consequence anticipation is based on nonemotional cues (NEC). However, it is unknown whether anticipation violation influences ERP responses to emotional facial expressions when the anticipation is based on emotional cues (EC). To understand this question, anticipatory cues were presented before fearful and happy facial expressions. Most often, the cues correctly suggested the emotional content of the facial expression but sometimes, another emotional category of facial expression was shown. Moreover, in the EC condition, emotional pictures were used as anticipatory cues, while scrambled pictures outlined in different colors were used as cues in the NEC condition. The ERP results showed stronger responses in early posterior negativity (EPN) and late positive potential (LPP) to facial expressions under the violated condition than under the nonviolated condition in the NEC condition, whereas these effects were absent in the EC condition. The findings might suggest that EC reduces the influences of anticipation violation on attention toward emotional facial expressions.
Keywords: cue valence, facial expressions, anticipation violation, EPN, LPPFacebook Primes Pain: An ERP Study on Priming and Pain Perception in Empathic Processes
Natalia Kopiś-Posiej, Andrzej Cudo, Paweł Krukow, Paweł Augustynowicz, Bartosz Postawa, Julia Pańczyk
Natalia Kopiś-Posiej, Medical University of Lublin, Al. Racławickie 1, 20-059 Lublin. Email: natalia.kopis-posiej@umlub.pl
Facebook is a platform for social contacts, establishing relationships, and solving interpersonal conflicts. Consequently, understanding online emotional and social behaviour in problematic and nonproblematic Facebook use is important to explore how people function on social media. In this context, the current study examined the differences between participants with low (LPFU) and high (HPFU) problematic Facebook use in pain perception associated with empathic processes using the event-related potential (ERP) paradigm. More precisely, the current study verified the impact of problematic Facebook use on pain-related stimuli during a subliminal affective priming paradigm task. Three types of priming were used: Facebook-related, pain-related, and neutral. The results showed that the HPFU group answered more slowly than the individuals from LPFU. Additionally, the N2 amplitude was sensitive both for Facebook-related and pain-related primes and painful and nonpainful stimuli types in the HPFU and LPFU groups. However, for the HPFU group, the N2 amplitude was more negative in the painful stimulus condition than in the nonpainful stimulus condition in the Facebook-related prime. The findings also showed that the P3 component was more positive in nonpainful than painful conditions. The study's results allow us to better understand the functioning of Facebook users in the context of emotional and social behavior online.
Keywords: priming, empathy, ERP, Facebook